Logical Deduction Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning

Logical Deduction Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers  | Logical Reasoning | Logical Deduction – Logical Reasoning questions and answers for interviews, entrance exams, and competitive ... Read more

Logical Deduction Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers  | Logical Reasoning

Logical Deduction Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers  | Logical Reasoning | Logical Deduction – Logical Reasoning questions and answers for interviews, entrance exams, and competitive examinations with explanations. Logical Issues This website contains Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers for test preparation. One of the most essential elements of any competitive examination, campus, or admission online test is logical reasoning. By attempting the online Logical Reasoning Deduction, students may assess their logical reasoning abilities. Take the Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Online Test and find out what your score is.

Logical Deduction Quiz Details

Logical Issues The Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers on our website provide detailed information on how the logical reasoning test is administered. The details of the Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Quiz are shown in the table above. Furthermore, we will often update the questions linked to the Logical Deduction on this current page. Candidates can refer to this article on a daily basis to learn about all of the questions pertaining to the topic of Logical Deduction. Take the online Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Test to learn about the many types of Deduction.

Quiz NameLOGICAL DEDUCTION
CategoryReasoning
Number of Questions30
Time30 Minutes
Exam TypeMCQ (Multiple Choice Questions)

LOGICAL DEDUCTION Online Test

Do you have any ideas on how to solve logical Deduction or answer logical reasoning questions? By completing the online activities provided below, candidates may effortlessly solve all types of Logical Reasoning questions based on Logical Deduction. Candidates can also use the online test to learn quick techniques for solving Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Questions. Students should understand all of the strategies in this article in order to answer questions about Logical Deduction. Individuals can practice the Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Online Test before attending any examination or interview. The questions in the provided Logical Deduction MCQ Quiz will have four alternatives. If the candidates select the correct option, the choice will become green. It will also provide the explanation for the Logical Deduction Logical Reasoning Questions. 

LOGICAL DEDUCTION ONLINE TEST- START NOW

1. Statements: No female teacher is allowed to participate. Athletes are among the female teachers.
Conclusions:Male athletes are allowed to participate.Some athletes are capable of participating.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: D

Explanation:
Because one of the premises is false, the conclusion must also be false. As a result, neither conclusion is correct.

2. Statements: Every bag is a cake. Every lamp is a cake.
Conclusions:Some lamps are in the shape of bags.There is no lamp in the bag.
a. Only conclusion I follows conclusion
b. Neither I nor II come next.
c. Either conclusion I or II follows conclusion.
d. Both I and II are in order.

Answer: C

Explanation:
There is no solid conclusion because the intermediate phrase ‘cakes’ is not dispersed even once in the premises. I and II, on the other hand, are only concerned with the extreme words and constitute a complimentary pair. As a result, either I or II will follow.

3. Statements: Mangoes are all golden in colour. Nothing of a golden hue is inexpensive.
Conclusions:Mangoes are all inexpensive.Mangoes with a golden hue are not cheap.
a. My only conclusion is that I.
b. Conclusion II is the only one that follows.
c. It’s either I or II after that.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The conclusion must obviously be universally negative and should not include the intermediate word. As a result, ‘No mango comes cheap.’ We can replace’mangoes’ with ‘golden-colored mangoes’ because all mangoes are golden in colour. As a result, II follows.

4.Statements: Some kings are also queens. All queens are stunning.
Conclusions:All kings are stunning.Queens are all kings.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. I and II are both followed .
c. Either I or II comes next.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Because one of the premises is unique, the conclusion must be unique as well. As a result, neither I nor II apply.

5. Claims: Some doctors are idiots. Some fools are well-off.
Conclusions:Some doctors are well-off.Some of the wealthy are doctors.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion B.
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion A.
c. Either I or II comes after D.
d. Neither I nor II come next

Answer: D

Explanation:
There is no definite conclusion because both premises are specific.

6. Claims: All highways are bodies of water. Some bodies of water are made up of vessels.
Conclusions:Some boats serve as highways.Every body of water is a boat.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion B.
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion A.
c. Either I or II comes after D.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: D

Explanation:
A type is the first premise, and it distributes the subject. As a result, the predicate’waters’, which is the middle term, is not dispersed. The second premise is that I type and neither the subject nor the predicate are distributed. As a result, the subject of the middle phrase ‘waters’ is not disseminated. There is no definitive conclusion because the middle term is not dispersed even once in the premises.

7. Statements: There is no such thing as a bat or a ball. There is no wicket in this game.All of the wickets are made of bats.
Conclusions:There is no such thing as a wicket bat
a. Only conclusion I follows conclusion
b. Only conclusion II follows conclusion
c. Either conclusion I or II follows conclusion .
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: D

Explanation:
There is no definite conclusion because both premises are negative.

8. All flowers are trees, according to the eighth statement. There is no tree that bears fruit.
Conclusions:There is no such thing as a flower.Some trees have the appearance of flowers.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion.
c. Either I or II comes after .
d. Both I and II are in order.

Answer: D

Explanation:
As previously stated, the conclusion must be universally negative and exclude the middle phrase. As a result, ‘No blossom bears fruit.’ As a result, I am the inverse of this conclusion. The second premise is the inverse of the first, so it also holds.

9. Claims: Every minister is a learner. Every pupil has never done something like this before.
Conclusions:Every minister has never served before.Students are among the inexperienced.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion.
c. Either I or II comes next.
d. I and II are both followed .

Answer: D

Explanation:
Every’ is the same as ‘All.’ As a result, because both premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must also be universal and affirmative, without the middle term. As a result, I am following. Because II is the inverse of the second premise, it is also true.

10. All roads are poles, according to the tenth statement. There is no such thing as a house made of poles.
Conclusions:Some roads lead to residences.Some of the dwellings are made of poles.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion.
c. Either I or II comes after .
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The conclusion must be universal negative because both premises are universal and one of them is negative. As a result, neither I nor II apply.

11. All fish are tortoises, according to the eleventh statement. There is no such thing as a
crocodile tortoise.
Conclusions:There is no such thing as a crocodile that is a fish.A crocodile is not a fish.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. Only conclusion II comes after conclusion.
c. Either I or II comes after .
d. I and II are both followed .

Answer: D

Explanation:
The conclusion must be universal negative because both premises are universal and one of them is negative. Also, the middle term should not be included in the conclusion. As a result, II follows; I is the inverse of II, thus it also holds.

12. Statements: There are angels among devout souls. Every social worker is an angel.
Conclusions:Social workers are some of the most dedicated individuals.Some social workers are true believers.
a. My only conclusion is that I
b. Conclusion II is the only one that follows.
c. Either I or II comes next.
d. Neither I nor II are true.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The first premise is a proposition in the form of an I. As a result, the predicate’s middle term, ‘angels,’ is not dispersed. The second premise is a proposition of type A. As a result, the predicate’s middle term, ‘angels,’ is not dispersed. There is no definitive conclusion because the middle term is not dispersed even once in the premises.

13. Statements: There is no such thing as a poor gentleman. All gentlemen are well-to-do.
Conclusions:There is no such thing as a wealthy impoverished man.There is no such thing as a poor rich man.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: D

Explanation:
Because the first premise is an E-type statement, the subject’s middle term, ‘gentleman,’ is disseminated. The second premise is a proposition of the type A. As a result, the subject’s middle phrase, ‘gentlemen,’ is spread. The conclusion cannot be universal because the middle word is spread twice. Because one of the premises is false, the conclusion must also be false. As a result, ‘Some wealthy persons are not poor.’ As a result, neither I nor II are followed.

14. Statements: Some swords are razor-sharp. All of the swords are rusted.
Conclusions:Some rusted objects are razor-sharp.Some rusted objects aren’t very sharp.
a. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
b. Only conclusion I comes after conclusion
c. Either I or II .
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Because one of the premises is unique, the conclusion must be unique as well, and should not include the middle term. As a result, I am following. The conclusion cannot be negative because both premises are affirmative. As a result, II does not follow.

15. Statements : All fish are grey in colour. Some fish are quite large.
Conclusions:Grey is the colour of all heavy fish.Light fishes do not all have the same coloration.
a. My only conclusion is that I.
b. Conclusion II is the only one that follows.
c. Either I or II comes next.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Because one of the premises is unique, the conclusion must be unique as well, and should not include the middle term. As a result, ‘Some hefty things are grey in colour.’ I is the result of this conclusion and the first premise added together. As a result, only I am in charge.

16. Statements: All good athletes triumph. Athletes who are successful eat healthy.
Conclusions:Everyone who eats well is a terrific athlete.Everyone who wins eats well.
a. Only conclusion I
b. Only conclusion II .
c. Either I or II.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Because the middle term ‘excellent athletes’ appears twice in the premises, the conclusion must be specific and exclude the middle term. As a result, “some of those who win eat well.”

17. Statements: All movie stars are also playback singers. Film directors are all movie stars.
Conclusions:Playback singers are all film directors.Some movie stars also work as directors.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Both I and II follow

Answer: D

Explanation:
Because both premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must also be universal and affirmative, with no middle word. As a result, I am following. The second premise is the inverse of the first, so it also holds.

18. Statements: There is a sun-set point in every hill station. X is a mountainous area.
Conclusions:There is a sun-set point in X.Other than hill stations, there are no sun-set places.

a. My only conclusion is that I.
b. Conclusion II is the only one that follows.
c. Either I or II comes next.
d. Neither I nor II come next.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Because both premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must also be universal and affirmative, with no middle word. As a result, I am the only one who pays attention.

19. Statements: Some dreams are nights. Some nights are more like days than others.
Conclusions:Every day is either a night or a dream.Some days are more like nights than others.All days are either nights or dreamsSome days are nights.

a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: B

Explanation:
There is no definite conclusion because both premises are specific. However, because II is the inverse of the second premise, it is true.

20. Statements: All tigers live in the jungle. Other tigers are tigers, and some tigers are horses.
Conclusions:Some horses are jungles, while others are deserts.The jungle has no horse.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: C

Explanation:
There is no solid conclusion because the middle phrase ‘tigers’ does not appear even once in the premises. I and II, on the other hand, are only concerned with the extreme terms and are hence complimentary. As a result, one of the two options is available.

21. Statements: Every pole is a gun. There are some boats that aren’t poles.
Conclusions:Every gun is a boat.Some boats aren’t designed to be used as weapons.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: D

Explanation:
Clearly, the term ‘weapons’ appears in both conclusions but not in any of the premises. As a result, neither conclusion is correct.

22. Statements: A lot of scooters are trucks. Every truck is a train.
Conclusions:Some scooters have the appearance of trains.A scooter is not a truck.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: A

Explanation:
Because the first premise is specific, the conclusion must also be specific and should not include the intermediate word. As a result, just I am following.

23. Statements : Some papers are pens. Angle is a type of paper.
Conclusions:Angle isn’t a type of pen.A pen is an angle.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: C

Explanation:
There is no firm conclusion because the middle term’papers’ are not dispersed even once in the premises. I and II, on the other hand, are only concerned with the extreme words and constitute a complimentary pair. As a result, either I or II will follow.

24. Statements: All birds are tall. Some of the tallest are hens.
Conclusions:Hens are a type of bird.Some of the chickens are rather tall.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: B

Explanation:
There is no solid conclusion because the middle term ‘tall’ is not dispersed even once in the premises. However, because II is the inverse of the second premise, it holds true.

25. Statements: Some papers are actually pens. Some pencils can also be used as pens.
Conclusions: Some pens can also be used as pencils.Some pens can be used to write on paper.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Both I and II follow

Answer: D

Explanation:
There is no definite conclusion because both premises are specific. I, on the other hand, is the inverse of the second premise, whereas II is the inverse of the first. As a result, both of them are correct.

26. Statements: Some males are well-educated. Small families are preferred by educated people.
Conclusions:Every modest family is educated.Some males prefer to be part of tiny households.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: B

Explanation:
Because one of the premises is unique, the conclusion must be unique as well, and should not include the middle term. As a result, just II is left.

27. Claims: Every educated person reads the newspaper. Rahul is not a newspaper reader.
Conclusions:Rahul is illiterate.It is not necessary to read the newspaper in order to be educated.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: A

Explanation:
The conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term because both premises are universal and one is negative. As a result, I am the only one who pays attention.

28. Statements: All pens are chalks. All of the chairs are made of chalk.
Conclusions:Some of the pens are also chairs.Some chalks can also be used as pens.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: B

Explanation:
There is no solid conclusion because the middle term ‘chalks’ is not used even once in the premises. However, because II is the inverse of the first assumption, it holds true.

29. Statements: Bureaucrats only marry intelligent women. Tanya is a brilliant woman.
Conclusions:Tanya is planning to marry a bureaucrat.Tanya has no intention of marrying a bureaucrat.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: C

Explanation:
There is no indication in the data that all intelligent girls are married to bureaucrats. As a result, either I or II might come next.

30. Statements: Some engineers are idiots. Anand is a professional engineer.
Conclusions:Some knuckleheads work as engineers.Anand is a complete moron.
a. Only conclusion I follows
b. Only conclusion II follows
c. Either I or II follows
d. Neither I nor II follows

Answer: A

Explanation:
There is no definitive conclusion because the middle term ‘engineer’ is not dispersed even once in the premises. However, because I is the polar opposite of the first assumption, it holds true.