Theme Detection Online Quiz Test – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning | Online Theme Detection Quiz With Explanation

Theme Detection Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers  | Logical Reasoning | Theme Detection – Logical Reasoning questions and answers for interviews, entrance exams, and ... Read more

by

Theme Detection Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning | Theme Detection

Theme Detection Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers  | Logical Reasoning | Theme Detection – Logical Reasoning questions and answers for interviews, entrance exams, and competitive examinations with explanations. Download a PDF of the online symbol series logical thinking quiz. Logical Issues This website contains Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers for test preparation. One of the most essential elements of any competitive examination, campus, or admission online test is logical reasoning. By attempting the online Logical Reasoning Deduction, students may assess their logical reasoning abilities. Take the Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Online Test and find out what your score is.

Theme Detection Quiz Details

Do you have any ideas on how to solve Theme Detection or answer logical reasoning questions? By completing the online activities provided below, candidates may effortlessly solve all types of Logical Reasoning questions based on Theme Detection. Candidates can also use the online test to learn quick techniques for solving Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Questions. Students should understand all of the strategies in this article in order to answer questions about Theme Detection. Individuals can practise the Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Online Test before attending any examination or interview.

Quiz NameTheme Detection
CategoryReasoning
Number of Questions30
Time30 Minutes
Exam TypeMCQ (Multiple Choice Questions)

Theme Detection Online Test

Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers on our website provide detailed information on how the logical reasoning test is administered. The details of the Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Quiz are shown in the table above. Furthermore, we will often update the questions linked to the Theme Detection on this current page. Candidates can refer to this article on a daily basis to learn about all of the questions pertaining to the topic of Theme Detection. Take the online Theme Detection Logical Reasoning Test to learn about the many types of Deduction.

Theme Detection Online Practice Test: Find Below 30 Online Quiz Test Question and Answers with Explanation -Start Now

1. Should India encourage exports when most of its resources are insufficient for domestic consumption?
Arguments: Yes. To pay for our imports, we need to earn foreign currency.
No. Even selective encouragement would result in a scarcity of resources.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Clearly, India can only export surplus and what is left over after meeting its own needs in order to pay for its imports. Export promotion cannot cause shortages because it will give resources for imports. So that’s the only argument I have.

2. Should all patented and produced pharmaceuticals in Western countries be tested on a sample basis before being approved for sale to the general population in India?
Arguments: Yes. For the Indian population, several of these medications require different doses and durations, thus it is important.
No. This is just not possible and, as a result, cannot be implemented.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Neither I nor II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
The government clearly considers the citizens’ health to be a top priority. As a result, before granting a licence to sell a product, such as medications, it must first be investigated and tested in the Indian setting. As a result, I am the only one who can make a solid case.

3. Should India make attempts to harness solar energy in order to meet its energy needs?
Arguments: Yes, most of the energy sources currently in use are finite.
No. Solar energy harvesting necessitates a large amount of capital, which India lacks.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Clearly, capturing solar energy will be beneficial because, unlike other resources, it is an unlimited supply. As a result, argument I is valid. However, point II is ambiguous because solar energy is the most cost-effective source of energy.

4. Should there be a student union at a college or university?
Arguments: No. This will foster a political climate on campus.
Yes. students are the next generation of political leaders.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Neither I nor II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
The foundation of a students union will be a step toward providing students with a basic education in politics. It will, however, generate a similar political atmosphere on campus. As a result, both arguments are valid.

5. Is it appropriate for India to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan?
Arguments:No. Kashmir is a lovely state. It generates a significant amount of foreign exchange for India.
Yes. This would aid in the resolution of disputes.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Clearly, India cannot part with a state that generates a significant amount of foreign cash for it. As a result, argument I stands up well. Furthermore, giving a piece of land away unconditionally and arbitrarily is not a good approach to settle a conflict. As a result, argument 2 is a little hazy.

6. Is it appropriate to foster cottage industries in rural areas?
Arguments: Yes. People in rural areas are inventive.
Yes. To some extent, this would assist in resolving the unemployment crisis.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Cottage industries must clearly be pushed in order to offer more work prospects for rural people in the villages themselves. The explanation behind rural people’s creativity is unknown. As a result, only argument II is valid.

7. s it appropriate to promote young entrepreneurs?
Arguments: Yes. They will contribute to the country’s industrial development.
Yes. They will lighten the burden on the labour market.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
It is obvious that fostering young entrepreneurs will pave the way for the formation of new industries. As a result, it will contribute to industrial development by not only employing entrepreneurs but also creating more job prospects for others. As a result, both arguments are valid.

8. Should all annual examinations up to and including Std. Is it possible to get rid of V?
Arguments:Yes. Young kids should not be saddled with exams that impede their natural development.
No. Students will not study seriously because they will be promoted to the following class automatically, which will have an impact on them in the future.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Either I or II is strong
c. Neither I nor II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
Clearly, the students cannot be saddled with studies at such a young age, nor can they be allowed to do studies at their leisure, as this will damage their fundamental foundation. As a result, both the arguments follows.

9. Should Indian scientists working in other countries be summoned to India?
Arguments:Yes. They must prioritise serving the homeland over all other considerations, including discoveries, honours, and facilities.
No. Let them stay where they want; we have enough talent.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
It goes without saying that everyone should be free to work anywhere they desire and that no one should be forced to stay in their own country. As a result, argument I is ambiguous. Talented scientists, on the other hand, can be of tremendous use to the country, and extra incentives or better opportunities may be made available to them in order to keep them in their motherland. As a result, argument II is equally invalid.

10. Should we abolish the system of formal education after graduation?
Arguments: Yes. It will imply starting work as soon as possible.
No. It will imply a lack of knowledge depth.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Clearly, argument I is unclear because many fields are open to anyone after graduation nowadays as well. However, eliminating post-graduate courses would eliminate higher and specialised studies that lead to a better and deeper comprehension of things. As a result, argument II is correct.

11. Should there be a 65-year-old age limit for running Parliamentary and Legislative Assembly elections?
Arguments: Yes. People above the age of 65 tend to lose their vitality and willpower.
No. People’s life spans have increased to the point where they can be physically and mentally active until they are 80 years old.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
A person’s age is not a criterion for appraising his mental capacity or administrative traits. As a result, none of the arguments hold water.

12. Should new large industries be established in Mumbai?
Arguments: Yes. It will result in the creation of new jobs.
No. It will exacerbate the city’s pollution problem.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: C

Explanation:
Opening up new industries is advantageous in that it creates additional employment opportunities, but it is unfavourable in that it contributes to pollution. As a result, either argument is valid.

13. Should towering chimneys be constructed in industrial buildings?
Arguments: Yes. It lowers pollution levels at the ground level.
No. It contributes to a rise in pollutants in the upper atmosphere.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Pollution at the ground level is the most dangerous in terms of harming human and animal life. As a result, only argument I is valid.

14. Is India really in need of so many development plans?
Arguments:Yes. Without good planning, nothing can be accomplished.
No. Planning consumes far too much time, money, and energy.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Prior to embarking on a new development programme, it is critical to prepare the precise aim, policies, and their implementation, as well as the allocation of finances, all of which point in the right direction. As a result, argument I stands up well. Planning also guarantees that all available resources and funds are fully utilised, as well as a step-by-step approach to the goal. As a result, allocating a portion of your budget to it is not a waste. As a result, argument II is invalid.

15. Should only deserving authors be permitted to publish their articles?
Arguments:Yes. It will save a significant amount of paper, which is now in short supply.
No. It is impossible to create a distinction between those who are deserving and those who are not.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Clearly, I did not present a strong basis to back the statement. It is also impossible to distinguish between those who are truly deserving and those who are not. So/argument II is a strong contender.

16. Should India’s colleges be elevated to the rank of universities?
Arguments: Yes. Colleges are in a better position to judge a student’s performance, resulting in more genuine degrees.
No. It is utopian to believe that there will be no nepotism or corruption in college degree awarding.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
Clearly, at the college level, all students are evaluated based on their performance on University Exams, not on any criterion relating to more personal interactions with students. As a result, argument I is ambiguous. Furthermore, at this level, degrees are awarded impartially and only on the basis of his performance. As a result, argument II is equally invalid

17. Should high-profile individuals who have unwittingly committed crimes be treated differently?
Arguments: Yes. The affluent do not engage in criminal activity on purpose.
No. Our policy is that everyone is treated equally before the law.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
The notion of ‘equality before the law’ is enshrined in India’s Constitution. As a result, argument II is persuasive. Also, we cannot determine a person’s motivations for committing a crime, therefore argument I is ambiguous.

18. Is it possible to manage pollution?
Arguments: Yes. Pollution can be controlled if everyone recognises the dangers it poses and works together to eliminate them.
No. The overcrowding of roadways, factories, and businesses, as well as an ever-increasing population hungry to acquire more property for housing construction, are out of control.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Neither I nor II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: C

Explanation:
Pollution control appears to be unachievable on the one hand due to ever-increasing needs and public concern, but it is possible through a cooperative effort on the other. As a result, either of the arguments will hold up.

19. Should India’s railways be privatised in stages, as it has done with other public sector enterprises?
Arguments: Yes. This is the only way to increase competition and provide better public services.
No. Multinational corporations will enter the conflict, posing a threat to our country’s national security.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
Privatization would almost certainly result in improved services. However, claiming that this is the “only way” is incorrect. As a result, argument I is invalid. Argument 2 also appears to be ambiguous.

20. Should internal assessments in colleges be eliminated?
Arguments: Yes. This will help to reduce the likelihood of favouritism.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Abolishing the internal assessment would surely reduce favouritism on personal grounds because the teachers would not be involved in examination system so that they cannot extend personal benefits to anyone. So, argument I holds strong. But it will not affect the control of teaching faculty on students because still the teachers would be teaching them. So, argument II is vague.

21. Should the city’s unlawful constructions be removed all at once?
Arguments: No. Where will the people who reside in these houses be able to live?
Yes. This will send a clear message to the general people, and they will desist from erecting illegal structures.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Demolition of unauthorised structures would serve as a lesson to unscrupulous builders as well as a message to individuals not to engage in similar behaviour in the future. This is necessary because unlawful structures place an unnecessary strain on the city’s infrastructure. As a result, only argument II is valid.

22. Should the number of ministers in the Central Government be capped at a certain level?
Arguments: No. The number of ministers to be appointed should be decided by the political party in power.
Yes. To avoid wasteful spending, the number of ministers should be limited to a particular percentage of the total number of members in parliament.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Clearly, there should be some limits on the number of ministers in the government, as having more ministers would increase government spending excessively. As a result, argument II is persuasive; additionally, granting liberty to the ruling party may encourage the extension of unjustified favours to some people at the expense of government finances. As a result, argument I is invalid.

23. Should foreign films be prohibited in India?
Arguments:Yes. They portray a foreign society that has a negative impact on our beliefs.
No. The artistic quality of foreign films is very excellent.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
Foreign films clearly represent alien culture, but this only aids in knowing more about it. As a result, argument I is invalid. Furthermore, the rationale given in argument II is insufficient to overturn the prohibition. As a result, it does not hold.

24. Is it beneficial for a client to buy products in instalments?
Arguments: Yes. He is required to pay a lower amount.
No, paying payments wreaks havoc on the household budget.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
When a buyer buys something in instalments, the interest is also factored in. As a result, argument I is invalid. Furthermore, someone who buys anything in instalments keeps track of his future budget because he knows exactly when and how much he has to pay. As a result, argument II is equally invalid.

25. Should Doordarshan be given self-governing status?
Arguments: Yes. It will assist Doordarshan in providing fair and balanced coverage of all major events.
No. The way events are covered will be decided by a select few who may or may not have a positive view.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Clearly, the Doordarshan’s autonomous status will be a step toward giving it independence in order to provide impartial coverage. The fact that it is autonomous does not imply that coverage will be decided by a select few. So that’s the only argument I have.

26. Should the adult education programme take precedence over the obligatory education programme?
Arguments:No. It will also help the obligatory education programme succeed.
Yes. It will aid in the eradication of adult illiteracy.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Clearly, argument I provides a reason in favour of the assertion, so it cannot be used to refute it. Adult education should be prioritised since it will help to decrease adult illiteracy and hence aid in the spread of education. As a result, only argument II is sufficient.

27. Is it necessary to construct new universities in India?
Arguments: No. We are still not on track to meet the literacy goal.
No. We will have to deal with the issue of those who are unemployed yet are highly qualified.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Both I and II are strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
Clearly, raising literacy rates should come first, rather than improving higher education. As a result, argument I is valid. Furthermore, as the number of universities grows, so does the number of degree holders, resulting in increased unemployment. As a result, argument II is likewise valid.

28. Should non-vegetarian cuisine be completely prohibited in our country?
Arguments: Yes. It is costly, and thus out of reach for the majority of people in our country.
No. In a democratic democracy like ours, nothing should be prohibited.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: B

Explanation:
Restricting people’s diets is clearly denying them their basic human right. As a result, only argument II is valid.

29. Should there be a complete ban on catching wild animals?
Arguments: Yes. Trappers make a lot of money; yet, Hunting and trapping bans are ineffective.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: D

Explanation:
It is obvious that a ban is required to protect our natural ecosystem. As a result, none of the reasons are convincing.

30. Should the government shut down public-sector businesses that are losing money?
Arguments:No. What will employees do if they lose their jobs, security, and income?
Yes. ‘Survival of the fittest’ is the rule in a competitive environment.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer: A

Explanation:
Closing public-sector enterprises will undoubtedly result in the layoff of employees. As a result, argument I is valid. Furthermore, shutting down a loss-making business is not an option. Rather, the reasons for its failure should be investigated, understood, and necessary reforms made. Even if this does not work out, the company could be sold off. As a result, argument 2 is a little hazy.

Similar Posts:
  1. Analyzing Arguments Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning | Analyzing Arguments
  2. Logical Deduction Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning
  3. Number Series Quiz – Reasoning Questions and Answers | Logical Reasoning
  4. Interview Questions and Answers of All IT Companies
  5. Government Syllabus